Skip to content

GOVERNED WORKFLOWS | ARCHITECTURE AND CONSTRUCTION

Put job-site information to work with a person at the action gate.

These fictional Contoso Builders workflows show what AI drafts, what a person approves, and which permissions each step needs on the Harbor Point Tower B project.

01 Source02 Boundary03 Human decision04 Evidence

CONTOSO BUILDERS | HARBOR POINT TOWER B

Four fictional workflows with an explicit permission row.

All names and examples on this page are fictional. The Microsoft Marketplace listing is pending; its action currently leads to Solutions.

What can AI reach?

Which actions need approval?

Can outside content redirect it?

Can your team stop it?

01

Safety by voice

The problem: Field observations reach the safety lead too late.

AI drafts: A cited hazard record from the supervisor's voice note.

A person approves: The safety lead confirms severity and assignment.

May see
Approved observation and site location.
May draft
Hazard record and routing suggestion.
May do with approval
Assign a corrective action.
May do alone
Nothing that changes a customer record or sends a message.

At Harbor Point Tower B, a fictional railing observation is routed to the safety lead before any crew instruction.

02

Certified payroll

The problem: A classification mismatch is found after payroll closes.

AI drafts: An exception list with the source row and wage rule.

A person approves: Payroll staff accept each correction.

May see
The approved sample export and wage schedule.
May draft
Exception list and correction proposal.
May do with approval
Submit a payroll correction.
May do alone
Nothing that changes a customer record or sends a message.

Contoso Builders sees a fictional classification mismatch before its weekly approval deadline.

03

RFI and submittal digest

The problem: A blocked decision disappears in a crowded RFI queue.

AI drafts: A cited priority digest of open items.

A person approves: The project manager chooses what to send and when.

May see
Approved RFI, submittal and schedule records.
May draft
A priority list and proposed follow-up.
May do with approval
Send the approved follow-up.
May do alone
Nothing that changes a customer record or sends a message.

On Harbor Point Tower B, a fictional submittal delay is surfaced before a subcontractor return visit.

04

Owner report

The problem: The owner report takes days to reconcile across systems.

AI drafts: A report with cited schedule, cost and issue changes.

A person approves: The project lead signs off on the exact report.

May see
Approved project status records.
May draft
A cited owner report.
May do with approval
Distribute the signed report.
May do alone
Nothing that changes a customer record or sends a message.

Contoso Builders reviews a fictional Tower B cost delta before sending the owner report.

OTHER INDUSTRIES

Use the same approval pattern for a different record.

Financial services Legal Healthcare

THE WOUND

What happens when the daily brief is wrong?

The superintendent finds out on site and you find out from the owner, which is why the brief here is drafted by AI and approved by a person before anyone reads it.

Four fictional workflows on Harbor Point Tower B show the pattern: a safety observation, a certified payroll exception, an RFI and an owner report. Each one names what AI drafts, who approves, and the permission row behind the step.

THE MICROSOFT INSIGHT

How does the brief wait for the project executive?

Copilot Cowork runs the multi-step task across Microsoft 365 and pauses for approval before a sensitive action such as sending the brief or posting it in Teams.

Copilot Cowork carries out multi-step tasks across Microsoft 365 and pauses for the user's approval before sensitive actions such as sending an email or posting in Teams. (Microsoft Learn, checked Oct 31, 2026)

With the pause, the owner reads what you approved. Without it, the owner reads what the model guessed.

THE ROW

Who approves what on a job site?

The project executive approves the brief and the owner report, payroll staff approve the certified payroll correction, and the safety lead approves the observation record, each named in the row.

  1. May see: the schedule, RFIs, timesheets and observations the signed-in person may already open.
  2. May draft: the brief, the exception note, the RFI triage and the owner report, with sources.
  3. May do with approval: send, post, correct, close, each released by its named approver.
  4. May do alone: nothing that changes a record or sends a message.

THE DATA

Does the project data have to leave your construction platform?

No. The workflow reads from it under the signed-in person's access and writes nothing back without the approval the row requires.

Your PMs keep their tools. What changes is that a draft arrives waiting for a decision instead of a blank page waiting for an hour.

Read in place and the platform of record stays the platform of record. Copy out and you own a second copy nobody governs.

THE FIRST RUNG

How does a general contractor switch the construction pack on?

With the free Copilot readiness check, then a scoping call that picks one workflow and one project, then the switch-on engagement for the pack on SimpleOS Delivery and Simple Time.

The pack is a Simple Intelligence Group product with its own Microsoft Marketplace listing, which is pending. Simplicity IT does the governance and the switch-on as a service, quoted after the call.

AFTER TWO WEEKS

What will be working after two weeks?

  1. One workflow and one project are chosen, with the approver and the deputy named.
  2. The permission row is written and the four questions are answered.
  3. The workflow runs on fictional Harbor Point Tower B data and the approver has seen the drafts.
  4. You hold the one-project pilot scope and its quote as a written decision.

HONEST ABOUT LIMITS

What this does not do yet

It does not keep an agent working when nobody is there to approve. Copilot Cowork carries out multi-step tasks across Microsoft 365 and pauses for the user's approval before sensitive actions such as sending an email or posting in Teams. (Microsoft Learn, checked Oct 31, 2026) The row names a deputy for the superintendent who is offline, and anything without an approver waits.

It does not run on a live project until the approver trusts the draft and you decide in writing.

It does not promise a saving: the measures beside each workflow are what to inspect, not a result.

THE ONE THING TO REMEMBER

AI drafts the brief; the project executive approves it; the owner reads an approved document.

Said another way: one project, one workflow, one approver, then widen.

Said a third way: the platform of record stays where it is.

SHOW YOUR WORK

See the control path on a fictional bank.

Governed in 90 Seconds

The agent action gate

The fictional bank records the exact action and approver.

Coming

See every demonstration

DIRECT ANSWERS

Questions before you decide.

Who approves when the super is offline?

The deputy named in the permission row. Anything without an approver waits, and nothing that changes a record or sends a message runs on its own.

Our data is in our construction platform. Does it move?

No. The workflow reads what the signed-in person may already open and writes nothing back without approval. The platform of record stays the platform of record.

Is this a new tool for our PMs?

No. Drafts arrive where your people already work in Microsoft 365, waiting for a decision.

Is Harbor Point Tower B a real project?

No. Contoso Builders, Harbor Point Tower B and Corliss Bay Construction are fictional and used in every example so no client is named and no result is implied.

How is it priced?

Quoted after a scoping call. The pack is a Simple Intelligence Group product on the Microsoft Marketplace; the switch-on is a Simplicity IT service with its own scope.

NEXT STEP

Start with a boundary you can explain.

Choose a focused check, or speak with the team about the workflow you need to improve.